High prevalence of frailty in patients with adrenal adenomas and adrenocortical hormone excess: a cross-sectional multi-centre study with prospective enrolment.

OBJECTIVE: Frailty, characterized by multi-system decline, increases vulnerability to adverse health outcomes and can be measured using Frailty Index (FI). We aimed to assess the prevalence of frailty in patients with adrenal disorders (based on hormonal sub-type) and examine association between FI and performance-based measures of physical function. DESIGN: Multi-centre, cross-sectional study (March 2019-August 2022). METHODS: Adult patients with adrenal disorders (non-functioning adrenal adenomas [NFA], mild autonomous cortisol secretion [MACS], Cushing syndrome [CS], primary aldosteronism [PA]) and referent subjects without adrenal disorders completed a questionnaire encompassing 47 health variables (comorbidities, symptoms, daily living activities). FI was calculated as the average score of all variables and frailty defined as FI ≥ 0.25. Physical function was assessed with hand grip, timed up-and-go test, chair rising test, 6-minute walk test, and gait speed. RESULTS: Compared to referent subjects (n = 89), patients with adrenal disorders (n = 520) showed increased age, sex, and body mass index-adjusted prevalence of frailty (CS [odds ratio-OR 19.2, 95% confidence interval-CI 6.7-70], MACS [OR 12.5, 95% CI 4.8-42.9], PA [OR 8.4, 95% CI 2.9-30.4], NFA [OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.7-15.9]). Prevalence of frailty was similar to referent subjects when post-dexamethasone cortisol was <28 nmol/L and was higher when post-dexamethasone cortisol was 28-50 nmol/L (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.7-16.5). FI correlated with all measures of physical function (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Whilst frailty prevalence was highest in patients with adrenocortical hormone excess, even patients with NFA demonstrated an increased prevalence compared to the referent population. Future longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the impact of various management strategies on frailty.

Medical treatment of acromegaly-experience from the Croatian acromegaly registry.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to review therapeutic outcomes of the medical treatment of patients with acromegaly based on real-world data from the Croatian Acromegaly Registry. METHODS: In this retrospective study we investigated 163 patients (101 female, 62 male, age at diagnosis 47.2 ± 13.4 years) treated between 1990 and 2020, of which 53 were treated medically (32.5%). The duration of follow-up was 115.8 ± 304.4 months. The remission rate after the pituitary surgery was achieved in 66.5% (n = 105/158; 5 patients refused surgery). Patients who did not achieve disease remission or had a relapse during follow-up (n = 2), underwent reoperation (n = 18/60, 30%) and/or radiotherapy (n = 33/60, 55%) and/or medical treatment (n = 53/60, 88.3%). One patient refused further treatment after the failure of the first pituitary surgery. RESULTS: Out of 53 patients treated with medical therapy, monotherapy was used in 34 (64.2%) and combination therapy in 19 (35.8%) patients. Remission (IGF-I < 1.2 upper limit of normal, ULN) was achieved in 51 patients (96.2%). Out of 53 patients, 21 (39.6%) were treated with first-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL-1) monotherapy, 10 (18.9%) with dopamine agonist (DA) monotherapy, one (1.9%) with pegvisomant monotherapy, 13 (24.4%) with a combination of SRL-1 and DA, three (5.7%) with a combination of SRL-1, DA and pegvisomant, two (3.8%) with a combination of second-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL-2), DA and pegvisomant and in one (1.9%) temozolomide was added on top of SRL-1 and DA. Two patients currently have active disease, both on SRL-1 monotherapy, of whom one is non-adherent to the treatment. Radiotherapy was applied to 27 (50.9%) patients on medical therapy. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that almost all patients with active acromegaly after pituitary surgery can achieve biochemical control with medical treatment.